Skip to main content

tv   Countdown With Keith Olbermann  MSNBC  October 5, 2009 10:00pm-11:00pm EDT

10:00 pm
and lindsey graham throws lonesome road's beck under the bus again. >> he doesn't represent the republican party. you can listen if you like. i choose not to. >> about the other fake populous? the senior campaign strategist for mccain/palin throws palin under the bus. again. >> she would not be a winning candidate for the republican party in 2012. and, in fact, were she to be the nominee, we could have a catastrophic election result. >> and sportsmanship. they already had an act of kindness planned for a high school football player leaving to fight cancer. when one coach decided to go even further. >> coach called a time-out, comes walking across the field and said, let's get him a touchdown. i started crying. >> and the david letterman story. what's new? well, i could write you a screenplay. it's tough when you know one of the people in the news story. i know both these guys. all that and more now on
10:01 pm
"countdown." good evening from new york. if you believe your lone sure fire way to protect your health insurance would be to work for a giant health insurance company, sorry. wellpoint, the nation's largest health insurance company, announcing besides layoffs it will raise premiums and deductibles for some health benefits of its employees. they're holding firm on one point. it wants an 18.5% rate hike on policyholders in maine. since the state has blocked that, wellpoint is suing maine. the senate and the white house would trust health insurance companies to police themselves in fixing their own ailing industry -- why? president obama welcoming 150 doctors, each clad in their white coats, representing every one of the 50 states, to the rose garden this morning. a recent npr poll of doctors at mt. sinai medicine school in new
10:02 pm
york showing that 63% of them give patients a choice -- favor giving patients a choice that would include both public and private insurance. another 10% of those doctors saying they would like a single payer system, medicare, for everybody. the president saying they are the professionals who have the most credibility on this issue. >> we have listened to every charge and every countercharge. from the crazy claims about death panels to misleading warnings about a government takeover of our health care system. but when you cut through all the noise and all the distractions that are out there, i think what's most telling is that some of the people who are most supportive of reform are the very medical professionals who know the health care system best. the doctors and nurses of america. every one of you here today took an oath when you entered the medical profession. it was not an oath that you would spend a lot of time on the phone with insurance companies.
10:03 pm
it was not an oath that you would have to turn away patients who you know could use your help. it was not devote your lives to being bean counters or paper pushers. you took an oath so you could heal people. you did it so you could save lives. >> senate republicans claiming not all medical professionals support the president on this issue. senator barrasso of wyoming an orthopedic surgeon, saying that many doctors and nurses are greatly alarmed at proposed cuts in medicare. others who act like republicans who still call themselves democrats, senator blanche lincoln, for instance, telling roll call she's all for public options so long as it is not a public option. ostensibly so she can sell it back home in arkansas. her quotes, i'm not supportive of a government-run and government-supported public option. that would be the definition of a public option. she adds, it's got to be competitive. it's got to create choice for people. choice is optional. last month, 55% of those people
10:04 pm
in her state surveyed by research 2000 were in favor of a public option. senator lincoln one of three who voted against the public option on the finance committee. the rest of the committee supposed to vote on its health care bill tomorrow. now it looks like that might not happen until next week because the congressional budget office is not expected to complete its assessment until the end of this week whether the bill would add to the deficit. why put off only until tomorrow what you can delay until next week? more on the doctor's white house call in a moment. first, howard fineman, senior washington correspondent for "newsweek" magazine. the president said he would not sign a bill that was not budget neutral at minimum. what happens if the congressional budget office comes back and says this piece of legislation is going to cost money? where will the process be then? >> first, let's explain why that might happen. i think it might happen. because the finance committee bill, the baucus bill, doesn't really have the employer mandate in it, doesn't have the public option. which means it wouldn't cover nearly as many people as some of
10:05 pm
the other bills would. so in order to make sure that the bill would cover more people, there's more spending there, there are more subsidies, more tax breaks for people. there are more ways to encourage people who can't pay to get the coverage they're required to get, to get it. that may be costly. it may cost more than the baucus committee estimated. i'm told by senate democratic leaders that i talked to that there is some, quote, wiggle room in the baucus bill. but what that might mean is after they get the cbo number back, if it isn't a number they like, you get yet another chance for even more delay. >> speaking of wiggle room, there's wiggle room on the other end. the "los angeles times" reported today the president's trying to shore up support for some form of a public option. if you put that together with the lincolnian definition of a public option out of arkansas. are we still talking about something we've titled a public option but has neither public in
10:06 pm
it nor offers any choice? >> i think that's possible. it's not likely. matter of fact, probably required in order for -- to be a final bill. what i'm told -- i talked to two democratic senators just a little while ago. what they told me is they're looking at a state by state option for a public option. in other words, it would be up to individual states. there might even be a trigger built in. we're back to triggers. so you have a trigger with a state by state option that might be watered down further. the trick of this whole thing is going to be to water the public option down enough to make sure that this thing can pass the senate at some point. because everybody who counts votes says that it's a very difficult thing to get every democratic senator, including blanche lincoln and some others, to vote for it, if it has a real public option in it. >> lord knows it's more important to pass a bill than to have anything in the bill. >> yeah, exactly. exactly. >> the thing with the doctors in
10:07 pm
the rose garden this morning was that the president trying to frame the message ahead of this next critical phase of this debate, which really would be pretty much a first for the president and his supporters on this side of the equation? >> yeah. yes. i think he's trying to get out ahead. whether this is necessarily the right way to do it -- you know, certainly doesn't hurt to be surrounded by doctors. they still have very high approval rating overall. but people are pretty sophisticated and know that a lot of doctors are part of the health care systems that are both a solution and a problem to some extent. so it's a little more complicated than that. i think what the president needs to do is not another photo op. he needs to get out there and he needs to publicly twist some arms in the same or definitively saying what he wants. he is still not doing that. >> but of course when you see doctors en masse like that endorsing something, the old commercial comes up. three out of four doctors prefer -- well, three out of four doctors are for either the public option or this stronger thing which is single payer. health insurance companies right now proving at the time of the debate they can't be trusted to police themselves. they're cutting -- cutting the benefits to their own employees.
10:08 pm
why am i cynical about the ability of these facts to break through all this noise? >> well, because, as i said, the president -- i don't think has been sharp enough. i don't think he's been definitive enough. i don't think he's been public enough in what he really wants. there's all this talk about how they're going around behind the scenes pushing this public option. if he really wants it he needs to say it more directly. have the doctors standing behind him if he's going to do it. his personal physician back in chicago is somebody who's very much in favor of the public option. you don't hear anything from that guy. you know, he's not -- i don't even know if he was in the rose garden today. probably not. >> it's doctor/patient privilege. >> exactly. >> howard fineman of msnbc and "newsweek." i'm joined now by dr. paul hakfeld from core valless in oregon. a member of mad as hell doctors. his organization was not invited to the event today at the white
10:09 pm
house. the doctor believes his group should be represented so he showed up anyway and talked his way inside. thanks for your time tonight. >> good evening. >> first, what exactly is mad as hell doctors mad about or are mad about? >> well, we're some oregon doctors, members of pnhp who are dismayed at the health care reform debate that wasn't going on in washington. there was a debate between a failed individual mandate with or without a wounded public plan. but what i'm really mad about and what we're mostly mad about is not health care. what we're mad about is that our legislatures were really complicit with the insurance industry in manipulating public policy so that it's more about profits than public good. and that's what we're seeing with this health care bill that's coming out of congress right now. or appears at least to be making it up the floor of congress. it's this individual mandate. and it really is incremental change that isn't going to shift
10:10 pm
the power of the industry in this health -- in this sick care nonsystem that we've got. >> this issue of the public option and the idea that it might get in name only or in watered down form, let alone the idea that the single payer went out the window months ago, before even the debate started or the compromising started. how do you feel about the status of the public option? >> well, if we had a real public option that really competed on a level playing field it may be a way to move towards having a real health care system. i would call it not watered down, i would call it wounded. the public plan option that we're going to get from this congress, since it's basically written by the industry, using our legislators, is designed to fail. it's designed to attract the sickest, most expensive patients, and that's called adverse selection. and adverse selection is the death nell to any insurance
10:11 pm
company and the public plan is just another insurance company. so after it comes online in 2013 and it starts to fail in 2016, at which point we're spending, what, 20% of our gnp on health care? the industry's going to look at this designed to fail public option and say, see, the government can't do health care, and it will just be the wrong lesson. the government can do health care. just look at the v.a. they've got excellent results. great patient satisfaction. very cost effective. now, is it adequately funded? no. but it produces a tremendous amount of help for the amount of money that they're spending. that's the whole point. we need to have a health care system that's designed and operated to get the most help we can for our health care dollars. right now, we're wasting 20% of all of our dollars servicing an insurance industry that adds nothing to the quality of the product, which is supposed to be health. president obama himself said on
10:12 pm
wednesday night a few months ago on national television, if you want true universal access, you're going to have to have single payer. i think that's true. the only way we're ever going to have true universal access, which is a moral imperative, is to get some savings in the system, 20% right off the top, and now we can cover everybody. and then we'll have a system so we can deal with all the other drivers on cost, which include some of the physician behaviors, because of the perverse incentives that encourage us to do more and more and more and more. >> last point. we know the doctors were not there -- the ones on camera there were basically not speaking on camera. they were more or less props for that imagery from the rose garden this morning. were any of you -- or were you collectively able to talk to the president about this? >> none of us talked to the president, as near as i can tell. but i talked to as many of those physicians as i possibly could. and i wasn't actually invited to the meeting.
10:13 pm
i just showed up at the gates and managed to get in. and virtually everybody -- the vast majority of the physicians i spoke to -- and i must have spoken to at least a couple dozen of them, want what i want and understand what i understand, which is that our health care system is profoundly broken that we're wasting a tremendous amount of money servicing the insurance industry. and that single payer is actually the best solution to this problem. the difference between them and me is they think we're only going to get incremental change from this congress. and i don't think incremental change is going to change the balance of power. i think we need real change. i think this is the civil rights issue of our generation and we have to start every discussion with access to appropriate health care is a human right. >> hence the term mad as hell doctors, entirely appropriate. dr. paul hochfeld, thanks for your time tonight. good luck with your efforts. >> thanks for having me. >> as the fight for health care reform reaches this critical time i have a brief programming
10:14 pm
announcement. wednesday, we will devote the entirety of "countdown" to special comment. on the need for reform, real meaning of reform, protests against it and what we, you and i can do about it. i will propose group action by patients. by which we might yet reclaim this debate from the corporation and the political foot draggers among us. program on special comment wednesday night here on "countdown." we have the democrats versus the republicans and democrats versus republicans and in republicans versus republicans news lindsey graham repudiates glenn beck again. everybody repudiates michael steele again.
10:15 pm
michael steele accused of making some when he damn well knew the republicans weren't supposed to have any. sarah palin accused of adhering too closely to that maxim. glenn beck accused of unduly influencing it. the feel good story of sports this year. plus as the letterman saga continue, finally some background of the man accused of the blackmail scheme from someone who once worked with the accused ex-torsist.
10:16 pm
that's me. okay, submarters. domino's just came out with four new oven-baked sandwiches. let's see what we're up against. mmm, is that pineapple and habanero sauce? yeah, we call that our new sweet & spicy chicken habanero. do we have any habanero sauce? do you see any habanero sauce? this one has feta cheese and roasted red peppers. yeah, we call that one our new mediterranean veggie. do we have roasted anything? no, chuck. we got lettuce. check out domino's four bold new oven-baked sandwiches for just $4.99, like buffalo chicken and italian sausage & peppers. from that first dollar forward, cash flow isn't just an important thing to small business.
10:17 pm
it's everything. that's why pnc is introducing your new cfo, cash flow options designed to effectively improve your cash flow. cfo helps every dollar work harder. from the very first dollar to the last dollar of the day. get in touch with your new cfo. pnc. leading the way.
10:18 pm
11 months after election day left republican politicians without a leader or the power to make policy, republican politicians are upset with their leader for making policy. our fourth story tonight. it gets less confusing. not to mention a lot more funny. when you hear the details. in august, republican chairman steele unveiled his senior bill of rights. the next month, john boehner, reports politico, the party's top elected leaders told steele to stop making party policy. politico quoting two unnamed people in the room saying steele was taken aback. his usual position. policy itself was not the issue. why start now?
10:19 pm
rather, the question was who makes the policy? steele responding, says politico, saying he gets asked around the country where the gop stands on a range of issues and he needed some answers. saying today he does not do policy. the republicans on the record said everybody made nice. anonymously a top gop aide also told politico that steele is, quote, on a short leash. whatever you think of the appropriateness of that phrasing, its accuracy seems in doubt. the gop website still has steele's senior bill of rights on full display. glenn beck's leadership, like steele's, also taking fire. beck responding on friday to criticism from republican senator graham saying, quote, lindsey graham hating my guts is probably the highest honor i've ever received. which sounds about right actually. yesterday beck's enabler pushed back at graham, asking him, quote, are you saying that glenn beck is bad for america? >> i'm not saying he's bad for america. you've got the freedom to watch him if you choose. he did a pretty good job on
10:20 pm
a.c.o.r.n. what i am saying, he doesn't represent the republican party. you can listen to him if you like. i choose not to. quite frankly, i don't want to go down the road of thinking our best days are behind us. we need to act decisively. people are genuinely upset with how much money we're spending up here. but at the end of the day, when a person says he represents conservatism and the country's better off with obama than mccain that sort of ends the debate for me as to how much more i'm going to listen. he has the right to say what he wants to say. in my view, it's not the kind of political analysis that i buy in to. >> let's turn now to msnbc political analyst, richard wolfe. author of "renegade, the making of a president." and senior strategist at public strategies. good evening, richard. >> good evening, keith. >> politico quotes this unnamed associate of steele saying the top aides have lingering resistance to fully accepting steele and another top aide gave
10:21 pm
that short leash quote. what are we hearing here? is it possibly some of the latent racism in the gop or more the conventional version by any republican to listen to anybody but themselves ever, the aversion to that? >> well, look, it's certainly been clumsy politics. today, michael steele says he doesn't do policy. tomorrow, he'll say he doesn't do politics either. the poor guy's got no leash. it's not even a short leash. to get to the race question, you have to understand that party's calculation of putting him there in the first place. it was a simplistic and crude equation they made. to cover themselves against any accusations of racism, boy, it's not that hard to find them, they needed to have a black figure going up against an african-american president. they didn't have many people to choose from with the token gesture. they had to choose someone who panl wasn't ready for primetime. all of that's being played out now. it turns out, irony of ironies,
10:22 pm
they don't even need any cover. they can be as outrageous as they like and portray the president as a witch doctor and they get on fox news. everything's fine. they didn't need the cover of michael steele. it's ironic for a party that always complained about quotas and affirmative action, they have found themselves with one. >> they did the same thing with sarah palin as the alternative to hillary clinton, which grows increasingly laughable with the passing day. >> because it looked so easy. they made it look easy. >> if it's too easy, as they say, that usually means it's too easy. what is, though, the power dynamic within the gop, boehner and the republican leader in the senate, mr. mcconnell are they steele's bosses? if they don't have policy, can they stop steele from making stuff up on behalf of the republican national committee? >> it's interesting, the comparison some people have drawn with howard dean of the dnc. he obviously had a very difficult relationship with harry reid and nancy pelosi. there is a world of difference here. the difference here is that this isn't an ideological split in the sense that dean represented
10:23 pm
the echoing wing of the democratic party. he has this policy hint erland that michael steele doesn't. it's not that michael steele represents the republican wing of the republican party, he re represent resentence an african-american view from maryland of what it should be. the reason he defends medicare is because that's where the center ground is. it's the government plan, lo and behold. you know, it's not that he represents the wing. he is trying to move the party in a position it doesn't want to go to. >> what's the graham/beck thing about? because if republican officials keep claiming that somebody else is leading -- or the leadership mantel does not belong to beck, it does not belong to palin, it does not belong to limbaugh, aren't they -- since there's nothing to hit, to replace the vacuum they, again, create time and time again here, don't they really just confirm that beck and palin and limbaugh are virtually the leaders? >> part of the problem is they are indeed a headless body. the other part is they're afraid that one of these media figures
10:24 pm
is going to take this party apart and launch their own. a third party bid. and glenn beck is going to be very happy to take republican establishment criticism. because i've said this for some time on this show, if there is going to be a demagoguic figure leading a third party run next time around, it's going to be someone like glenn beck. so hold on to your hat. >> i believe there's only the one someone like him. let's not find out. richard wolffe, of msnbc. author of "renegade." also senior strategist at public strategies, great thanks, richard. >> thank you, keith. sarah palin faring no better tonight. thrown under the bus by a key mccain advisor. friday, one of them called her potential candidacy a catastrophe. today somebody else used the term an apocalypse. put them together and it's the palin catastro-pocalypse. and a high school football coach tries to do something nice for one of his players after a cancer diagnosis only to find out the other team's coach was trying to do something nicer for him. next.
10:25 pm
let's wash it with febreze! whoa! [ sniffs ] [ male announcer ] for all the things that you can't wash, wash it with febreze. with cialis for daily use... a clinically proven, low-dose tablet for erectile dysfunction you take every day so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. don't drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache.
10:26 pm
to avoid long term injury seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away. (announcer) 36-hour cialis. or cialis for daily use. ask your doctor about cialis today, so when the moment is right, you can be ready. [screeching] [dejectedly] oh. [screeching] [barks] (man) if you think about it, this is what makes the ladders different from other job-search sites. [screeching] we only work with the big talent. [all coughing] welcome to the ladders-- a premium job site for only $100k-plus jobs
10:27 pm
10:28 pm
normally it's a break here from the crowd of politicians. we do an anniversary on oddball and best persons. tonight, a different kind of break. a simple restore your faith story that i was privileged to bring you first last night on football night in america. despite all the self-absorption and rule breaking in sports the old fashioned concept of sportsmanship is to some degree back in vogue. last year, college softball player hit a game winning home run only to tear up her knee. so two of her opponents who she
10:29 pm
had just beaten picked her up and carried him around the bases. in ithaca, new york, six high school cross country runners wandered off the course. when they finally found the finish line though none were friends they agreed to cross in the same order they had been in when they got lost. then there was what happened in a high school football game a week ago saturday in connecticut. to coaches agreed on a caring gesture for an ailing player. that was only the start of the sportsmanship. >> i wasn't really upset about the cancer or anything. it was just the fact i couldn't play football. it wouldn't have been bad if i could keep playing football through it. i guess they don't want me doing that. i'd go out there and play right now if i could. >> nick reardon who will turn 17 years old a week from thursday, has testicular cancer. the linebacker offensive guard and punter for the wildcats. the game against the falcons was to be his last in uniform. before nine weeks of intense chemotherapy began. he couldn't play. doctors would not let him risk
10:30 pm
getting hit. but nick's coach, jamie cody, had a wonderful idea. if it's the fourth quarter and the game's decided, cody asked avon coach just before kickoff, can i put him in to punt and have you not rush? he didn't hesitate. absolutely, he said. seven turnovers later, nick and coach cody were down 42-0. when cody saw avon coach quinnon gesture towards him. >> colts call a time-out. comes walking across the field. said, let's get him a touchdown. i started crying. i put nick in the game. >> i didn't know it was fake. everybody else did. i didn't. when the line opened up, i just went for it. got my touchdown. >> with his best friend since elementary school, kyle, leading the blocking for all 82 yards and the other wolcot tech and avon players fighting each other to get a better view of the
10:31 pm
play, nick got his touchdown. and two teams celebrated in one end zone. >> just a glorious feeling. i mean you got your entire team behind you supporting you through everything whether it's chemo or running in a touchdown. they're like my family. i love those guys. >> on monday, when wolcot tech went back to practice, reality hit again. nick's chemo began. and then reality would be sacked yet again. when the wild cats gathered later in the day for a film session, there was nick, sitting through some tough images of a 49-6 loss just like anybody else on that team. well, tough images, save for one touchdown. nick reardon still attending practice despite the chemo and despite the fact he can only watch. wrong about all this in one detail only. i didn't know it was a fake, he said of his touchdown. nick, that was no fake.
10:32 pm
a politico apocalypse. that is what a sarah palin presidential nomination could be in 2012 according to who? really? next.
10:33 pm
10:34 pm
10:35 pm
the number one prospect for the republican presidential nominee in the year 2012 is an unemployed blogger who quit her job to spend more time on facebook and still had to hire somebody else to write her book for her. if you consider the prospect of half governor sarah palin running for president three years from now, a political apocalypse, unquote, you're not a terrorist, palin unamerican pinko. you're one of several top political advisers to republican senator john mccain. now it is john weaver telling the "washington post" he is almost sure palin would never win his party's nomination. and if they did, quote, it would mean a political apocalypse is upon us. we can even simulate in visual terms exactly what kind of apocalypse the republican party would have to look forward to in 2012. weaver was reacting to an only slightly less dire prediction. his campaign manager steve schmidt who was asked about
10:36 pm
palin 2012 on friday. >> my honest view is that she would not be a winning candidate for the republican party in 2012. and, in fact, were she to be the nominee, we could have a catastrophic election result. >> palin in the news right now thanks to her number one book, a book that became number one thanks in part to right wing books buying it in bulk on preorder and planning to give it away as part of a promotional vehicle. let's turn now to margaret carlson. washington editor for "the week" magazine. if you put the quotes together, you get catastrophic apocalypse. can you put this into some sort of context for us? what does it take? how often has this ever happened before for sort of republican operatives to break ranks three years in advance? and savage a former running mate like this? >> well, it doesn't happen that often. steve schmidt did this at the washington ideas forum.
10:37 pm
i was there. he does not do it with glee. it would be in his interest to push sarah palin, in that republicans like to do things in an orderly fashion and sarah palin would be next in row to run for president since presumably at 76 john mccain will be too old to run. so he's not doing it out of self-interest. it is out of having been very, very close for a number of months. no other political strategist has been that close. and concluding that she's not fit to run. and that doing -- putting her forward would injure the republican party as he said catastrophically. >> are they right on some sort of objective level or is this just sniping by two sides around a massive scism like goldwater
10:38 pm
people versus rockefeller people in '63 and '64? >> well, like a rockefeller kind of person. some republicans would like a rockefeller type to run. because while they have some passion on the right in sarah palin, they don't have any passion in the middle, or passionate middle candidate, to attract the voters that they were sorely lacking in the last election. if steve schmidt and john weaver and others had a candidate in front of them, i think they would, you know be happy, but they just don't. having, you know in a piece in "vanity fair," steve schmidt was quoted as calling sarah palin a mental case. and trying to get her ready for the debates. she would take no advice whatsoever. and only for -- towards the end, only from her family. she would only speak to members of her family who had never been in a debate before. >> mr. schmidt has also reportedly said that mrs. palin
10:39 pm
has not done anything since last year to broaden her base. you know, as if quitting the job isn't doing something. but if he's right, what, if anything, could she do to broaden her base? >> well, candidates often retreat, study. get in touch with the leading thinkers in their party. i mean she could go to kato or heritage. there are any number of them. she could seek out foreign policy experts. there's always been an anti-intellectual streak actually in both parties. the populism of both parties. sarah palin seemed -- but lots of times the candidates are faking it. they're actually quite intelligent and have gone to ivy league universities and whole bunch of other things. sort of they fake it. but sarah palin seems genuinely committed to knowing as little as possible. >> well, she's doing a great job. listen to me, i'm complainting -- i'm complimenting her.
10:40 pm
she's doing a great job of that. margaret carlson, thank you. >> thanks, keith. this question about the david letterman story, if this were about a not very famous comedian, wouldn't the story be cbs news producer arrested on charge of blackmailing comedian? calls for cbs news to investigate itself? a resident of his state tells a georgia congressman he tried to kill himself and was prescribed medicine he could not afford. congressman paul brown says you should go to an emergency room. when rachel joins you at the top of the hour treason in effect for the gop. first, tells china, we're not good for our debts. a senator tries to go to honduras to meet with a government we don't recognize. now senator inhofe is going to copenhagen to deny the existence of climate change. when i first saw the new outback it looked so different to me. but when i got back from my first trip... ...the look was unmistakable.
10:41 pm
more room for adventure. the all-new subaru outback. more room for adventure. tide stain release. it helps get the toughest stains out the first time. whoa, that's a first. [ female announcer ] that's because new tide stain release is a revolutionary in-wash booster that works with your detergent to help remove the toughest stains... ...the first time. mom, let me grab that. another first. [ female announcer ] new tide stain release. stains out. no doubt. about him from all the other girls. we were working at the same company. and she was something else. announcer: take care of each other, and your health. with nature made cholestoff. cholestoff helps lower ldl cholesterol, the bad kind, naturally, by using the same types of phytonutrients found in nuts, grains, fruits, and vegetables.
10:42 pm
he makes me laugh. he still does, but it's nice. announcer: learn how to lower your cholesterol, naturally, at cholestoff.com. nature made. fuel your greatness. you heard a lot about david letterman. and the $2 million blackmail screen play. tonight, you'll hear about the man accused of concocting the scheme from somebody who once knew him, me. first, congressman brown.
10:43 pm
i couldn't believe i was actually having a heart attack. i remember being at the hospital, thinking about my wife. i should have done more to take care of myself. now i'm exercising, watching my diet, and i trust my heart to lipitor. (announcer) unlike some other cholesterol lowering medications, lipitor is fda approved to reduce the risk of heart attack, stroke and certain kinds of heart surgeries in patients with several common risk factors or heart disease. lipitor is backed by over 17 years of research. lipitor is not for everyone, including people with liver problems and women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. you need simple blood tests to check for liver problems. tell your doctor if you are taking other medications or if you have any muscle pain or weakness. this may be a sign of a rare but serious side effect. i'll never forget what i went through. don't take your health for granted. (announcer) have a heart to heart with your doctor about your risk. and about lipitor.
10:44 pm
the david letterman saga overshadowing what otherwise would be a journalism scandal of biblical proportions. what do you mean a cbs news producer tried to extort $2 million with letterman? what do you mean i used to work with him? that's next. first, number two story. he has written his seventh climate change denying column of the year. claiming because there has not been significant warming, since 1998 climate change has stopped. last friday the folks at think
10:45 pm
progress wrote this is looking like the last ten days of the baseball season to decide who won the pennant. their quote, by this logic, we'd have to conclude that the toronto blue jays just clinched the a.l. east division title. while the new york yankees lost their last game and are only 7-3. mr. will's response which was, quote, you don't seem to understand baseball, the blue jays are not even in contention. that's the point. they're not even in contention. forget it. look at me, i'm arguing with a superintelligent garbage compactor. boss limbaugh once again introducing cliche's he and dumb people like him can easily understand. the subject this time, the olympic vote. obama cannot win in a fair vote. the only thing missing in that vote over there today was acorn. had acorn representation stuffing ballot boxes, registering fake ioc members, then maybe chicago would have had a chance. obama couldn't do that. see, obama doesn't debate people. he clears the field -- do you know anything about the olympics? about the fact that the international olympic committee
10:46 pm
and the u.s. olympic committee have had more disputes between them than, say, we do with fox news? we may not see the u.s. get the games again in our lifetime? over fights about tv rights and marketing fees that would still be there even if lyndon larouche were president? i'm tempted to ask you, sir, not to talk about things you don't understand but if i did that, your show would be three hours of silence. our winner, congressman paul brown of georgia. at a town hall, a man from athens, georgia, said he had tried to kill himself. he was then diagnosed with major depressive disorder and prescribed medicine which he went into $1700 worth of debt before he had to stop buying it. >> for the last two years i've lived in misery because i can't afford insurance for this disease i've been diagnosed with. i just want to share what it's actually like here. >> depression is a horrible disease. i've treated a lot of that in my career and the thing is, people who have depression, who have
10:47 pm
chronic diseases in this country, physicians are treating folks. people can always get care in this country by going to the emergency room. the question is, can everybody have access to health care in this country. the question is who pays for it, where do they get it and at what cost? going to the emergency room is the most expensive way of trying to deliver health care. >> that's why we need a public option. >> emergency room treatment for depression? like two aspirin for cancer. congressman brown is, by the way according to his resume a doctor. a, i fear for his patients. b, damn it, i want to see his diploma. congressman dr. paul hippocratic oath, what hippocratic oath brown, today's worst person in the world.
10:48 pm
reduces puffiness immediately -- and also helps with lines and wrinkles. not surgery. this is our way to do your eyes. new regenerist anti-aging eye roller.
10:49 pm
it was tough news to hear. everything changed. i didn't know what to do. right about then, our doctor mentioned the exelon patch. he said it releases medicine continuously for 24 hours. he said it could help with her cognition which includes things like memory, reasoning, communicating and understanding. (announcer) the most common side effects of exelon patch are nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. the likelihood and severity of these side effects may increase as the dose increases. patients may experience loss of appetite or weight. patients who weigh less than 110 pounds may experience more side effects. people at risk for stomach ulcers or who take certain other medicine should talk to their doctor because serious stomach problems, such as bleeding may worsen. mom's diagnosis was hard to hear, but there's something i can do. (announcer) visit exelonpatch.com for free caregiving resources.
10:50 pm
10:51 pm
cbs guy was arrested -- it's the guy he's accused of blackmailing who some critics think needs to be investigated. the alleged blackmailer is not talking. the target who will on his show tonight say, i want to apologize one more time to the former governor of alaska. he saw his ratings jump 38% the night after his confession. as if we weren't upside down enough on this story i first met david letterman in 1996 but i spent about a year working with robert joe halderman at cnn beginning in 1981. number one story tonight, halderman, 27-year veteran of cbs news, before that, assignment editor at cnn in new york where i was the sports reporter and this network's president was the producer, defended today in several venues by his attorney gerald shargel.
10:52 pm
trying to define halderman's character, citing the opinion of co-workers. and the halderman trophy case. >> the thing about halderman as a person, those who know him think about joe halderman, they think about how unlikely this is. people like dan rather, people who have worked with joe halderman at cbs for 27 years, he's been there for more than half his life. he's an emmy award winning journalist. >> yeah, there's no personal credential issue in the emmys. they give them to anybody who wins. also, i'm here to say, not so fast. i look forward to cross examining david letterman because i don't think the full story is before the public. there's much more to the story. yes, halderman did deposed a $2 million check from letterman but the surrounding circumstances are what's relevant. quote, any encounter i've had with him has been unpleasant. he thinks because he's a tv executive he can treat people like dirt. at the recording of tonight's show, letterman apologized to his wife and his staff and
10:53 pm
thanked those on his show for, quote, once again putting up with something stupid i've gotten myself involved in. before the apologies, there were a few jokes. >> did your weekend just fly by? i mean -- i'll be honest with you, folks, right now, i'd give anything to be hiking on the appalachian trail. i got into the car this morning and the navigation lady wasn't speaking to me. >> joining me now is marissa guthrie, programming editor for broadcasting and cable magazine. thanks for coming in tonight. >> thank you, keith. >> the calls on this publicly have been cbs should investigate letterman. i'm missing something in this equation. there was a guy who works for
10:54 pm
cbs who was investigated. isn't there some reason to be looking into whether or not cbs news was somehow connected to this or if a man's been working there for 27 years and winds up getting arrested in exchange for squelching basically a news story, wouldn't somebody say, well, don't know that there is evidence this has happened before, we need to investigate that process, as much as you need to investigate whatever letterman's done, right? >> this has put cbs in an extremely difficult position. it's surreal for them to be covering -- reporting on one of their anchors, one of their producers and one of their biggest stars. i think employment lawyers will tell you, and they most certainly have to be launching an investigation into both of -- both letterman and halderman. to find out exactly what went on. >> dan rather who i know and like very much, defended joe. and i knew him 26, 27 years ago. when i knew him, he was as talented as anybody i've worked with. supernaturally so almost. the emmy awards and everything else didn't surprise me. but somebody asked me about this
10:55 pm
man the other day and i said if you gave me a list of 250 people i have worked with and said one of these people has been accused of doing this, i know he would have been at least on my list of top five candidates of the people i knew. and then the "new york observer" quoted somebody identified as only a associate. directly out of the paper, if you said which cbs news producer would be caught up in this thing, he would have been the first to come to mind. his personality pushes the envelope. as a breaking news producer, that's what you need, but you could see how he would be living on the edge a bit. and the former cbs executive said, it sounds to me like a nervous breakdown of some sort. there are a lot of answers in here. are they all right or parts of all of them are right or what? >> i think people who did what halderman did, working at those fireman's bureaus, where they're parachuted in to hot spots and war zones, take a lot of risks. they're shot at. they're mock executed. they're kidnapped. you start to live that life. and, you know, anything else probably seems rather mundane.
10:56 pm
i don't know mr. halderman. a lot of people that come back from doing that job suffer ptsd. and that has all has effects on marriage, et cetera. so everyone who's worked with him finds this incident extremely bizarre. >> the other thing of course is if you survive all that, you begin to think you can survive almost anything when maybe the people who did not last in the business for whatever reason have left for safer ground. you think you own that territory i guess. >> well, yeah, you have -- maybe you feel like you have nine lives. >> yes. about david letterman. first, is it not well known that 90% of men who go into television do so to impress women? and at comedy clubs, the figure is 100%? isn't that sign still hanging there? >> is that why you went into television? >> perhaps originally it was one of my motives. i thought there was a sign at every comedy club in america that said "do not feed the comedians." >> i don't think a lot of people go in to foreign news producing to attract women.
10:57 pm
it can be -- i think being the boy friday to an anchor star can be kind of castrating. >> but the halderman lawyer is the one part i really don't understand. what is it with the wait until i cross examine letterman defense? doesn't seem to be any explanation offered of what his client did, just what he's going to do on the stand himself. >> you know, shargal's very shrewd. i think though what he's trying to do going on all the morning shows today, talking about how upstanding his client is, is wrest control of the message back from letterman. letterman got out ahead of it. and he framed it himself. he's the victim. and the lawyer is trying to say, well, wait a minute here, and try to depict letterman as, you know, some skivvy guy having lots of office affairs with women half his age. i don't know how you -- how that works for you as a legal strategy. >> yeah, exactly. >> as a public relations strategy, that seems to be what he's doing.
10:58 pm
>> what does it have to turn into? because it clearly isn't -- his ratings were up 38% after the first night. what does it have to turn in to to genuinely damage david? >> i think more -- if unsavory details come out, besides just the fact he was having these affairs. and advertisers start to get squeamish and start to go away, then that will be a big problem for cbs. i mean, we don't know what kind of details are going to come out yet about letterman or mr. halderman. but, you know -- and letterman's audience is 58% women. so i think he humanizes himself a lot tonight, when he talks about being in the dog house with his wife. and i think a lot of people can relate to that. >> marissa guthrie of broadcasting and cable magazine. thanks for coming in again. that's "countdown" for this. the 2,349th day since the previous president declared mission accomplished in iraq. the programming reminder, this
10:59 pm
wednesday, we'll devote the entire hour of "countdown" to special comment on health care reform in this country. the real fear preventing its implementation and what you and i can possibly do about it. i'm keith olbermann. good night and good luck. and now to discuss why a republican senator is going to copenhagen to tell the world that climate change does not exist, here is rachel maddow. >> thank you very much. it's a day of news in which the theme was revenge. the sweet revenge of success as someone fired from the bush administration for criticizing it won the nobel prize. the vicious revenge of a husband against the married senator who seduced his wife. and the revenge the perhaps unlikely revenge of liberals in congress. who have boomeranged the right wing crusade against a.c.o.r.n. into a crackdown on corporate crime. that's left republicans not knowing which way is up. that is all coming up this hour. we begin tonight with a window into the soul of america's modern conservativve
left
right